Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Arctic Report Card: Update for 2022
The warming Arctic reveals shifting seasons, widespread disturbances, and the value of diverse observations
Archive of previous Arctic Report Cards
2022 Arctic Report Card

Partnering in Search of Answers: Seabird Die-offs in the Bering and Chukchi Seas

R. Kaler1, G. Sheffield2, S. Backensto3, J. Lindsey4, T. Jones4, J. Parrish4, B. Ahmasuk5, B. Bodenstein6, R. Dusek6, C. Van Hemert7, M. Smith7, and P. Schwalenberg8

1U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Alaska Region, Anchorage, AK, USA
2Alaska Sea Grant, Marine Advisory Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Nome, AK, USA
3National Park Service, Fairbanks, AK, USA
4Coastal Observation and Seabird Survey Team, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
5Marine Advocate, Kawerak Inc., Nome, AK, USA
6National Wildlife Health Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Madison, WI, USA
7Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, AK, USA
8Alaska Migratory Bird Co-Management Council, Anchorage, AK, USA


  • During 2022, the northern Bering and southern Chukchi Sea region reported the sixth consecutive year of higher-than-expected beach-cast seabirds (2017-22).
  • Reports of beach-cast carcasses ranged from Point Hope to Izembek Lagoon and numbered ~450, fewer than in the preceding several years but a continued concern for coastal communities.
  • Tracking the duration, geographic extent, and magnitude of seabird bird die-offs across Alaska’s expansive and remote coastline is only possible through well-coordinated communication and a dedicated network of Tribal, State, Federal, and university academic partners.


Prior to 2015, seabird die-offs in Alaskan waters were rare; they typically occurred in mid-winter, linked to epizootic disease events or above-average ocean temperatures associated with strong El Niño-Southern Oscillation events (Bodenstein et al. 2015; Jones et al. 2019; Romano et al. 2020). Since 2015, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has monitored mortality events that have become annual occurrences in Alaska (Fig. 1). Since 2017, communities on the coasts of the northern Bering and southern Chukchi Seas have annually observed dead and dying seabirds along their coasts (Fig. 2). Affected species included birds that consume plankton such as auklets (Aethia spp.), plankton and fish consumers such as shearwaters (Ardenna spp.) and northern fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis), primarily fish-consuming murres (Uria spp.), puffins (Fratercula spp.), and kittiwakes (Rissa spp.), as well as low numbers of benthic feeding sea ducks (Somateria spp.) (U.S. Geological Survey 2022). The range of seabird and prey species involved, the timing of these die-offs throughout summer, and the localization of events over widespread areas indicate environmental causes at multiple trophic levels. Such wildlife mortality events are a public health concern for coastal communities that rely on ocean resources for their nutritional, cultural, and economic well-being. They have also been seen as a harbinger of concern for the state of the Arctic Ocean itself.

1970 to present. Since 2015
Fig. 1. Alaska seabird die-offs, 1970 to present. Since 2015, mass die-offs have annually occurred in Alaska. Species primarily affected include murres, puffins, auklets, shearwaters, fulmars, and kittiwakes. (Credit: Sarah Battle, NOAA/PMEL; modified original by Robert Kaler).
mass die-offs have annually occurred in the northern Bering and southern Chukchi Sea region. Species primarily affected include murres
Fig. 2. Alaska seabird mortality records, 2017-22. Size of concentric circles indicates the cumulative count of seabird carcasses reported each month of the corresponding year, aggregated into 100×100 km grid cells overlaid onto the map. Note that locations with no reported carcass counts may result from remoteness and/or lack of visitation or reporting capacity, rather than a lack of seabird carcass deposition. Species/species groups are summarized by month, indicated by color of circle, and percent (%) of total reported (N) each month. Reports courtesy of Tribal, State, and Federal partners.

Seabirds are sentinels of the status of marine ecosystems and these die-offs are concurrent with a massive ecological shift resulting from the loss of sea ice extent and duration in the Bering and Chukchi Seas (Stabeno et al. 2019). Seabirds are top predators, with many consuming forage fish. For example, Pacific sand lance (Ammodytes hexapterus), which are a small forage fish found in the nearshore area, are a high-quality prey item, rich in nutrients and calories (Robards et al. 1999). Similarly, Pacific capelin (Mallotus villosus) are associated with cold water and are high in nutrients and calories (Montevecchi and Piatt 1984). With increasing ocean temperatures, the numbers of sand lance and capelin have declined, while the numbers of juvenile (Age-0) walleye pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus) and Pacific cod (Gadus macrocephalus), which are lower quality prey compared to sand lance and capelin, have increased (Duffy-Anderson et al. 2019). Age-0 walleye pollock and its caloric value have been compared to “junk food” (Romano et al. 2006). A drastically increased abundance of Age-0 pollock in warm years (Renner et al. 2016) may compensate for low-energy content of individual fish (Kokubun et al. 2018). Lastly, planktivorous seabirds consume Euphausiids (krill), which are high-value but only locally and seasonally available, and copepods—a group of small crustaceans that vary in size and energy value. As an example of metabolic rate, common murres (Uria aalge) are thought to consume 10-30% of their 1050-gram body mass every day, which equates to ~90-300 fish per day (Ainly et al. 2002). While the specific cause of why seabird die-offs have increased in frequency remains largely unknown, the decrease in sea ice extent and lipid-rich ice algae along with warmer ocean conditions are likely involved.

Findings to date, 2017-21

Apparent emaciation was the most significant factor contributing to death based on a combination of field reports, laboratory assessments, and ancillary test results of examined carcasses (Table 1; Bodenstein et al. 2022). Researchers continue to evaluate possible contributing factors. Sample size was limited in 2022, but Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI H5 or H7; see HPAI discussed in Arctic Geese essay) has not been confirmed in seabird carcasses except for gulls (Larus spp.) and jaegers (Stercorarius spp.), which scavenge on carcasses of other birds and mammals. Additionally, H10N6 (a Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza) was detected in two murres samples from St. Lawrence Island in 2018 (Will et al. 2020a).

Table 1. Summary of Bering and Chukchi Seas seabird necropsies, 2017-21. More than 14,000 dead seabirds were reported and a total of 117 carcasses were examined. 92 cases had emaciation identified as the Cause Of Death (COD), seven cases where COD was undetermined, and 17 cases where COD was determined as “Other”, which included predation, trauma, encephalitis, peritonitis, and bacterial infection. Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza (n=4) and saxitoxin (n=15) were also detected; however, the virus and biotoxin were not determined to be the COD except for one case in 2020 where saxitoxin toxicosis was suspected.
  2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
Total Reported >1,600 >1,200 >9,000 >330 >2,200 >14,330
Total Examined 19 25 39 20 14 117
Reported Cause of Death            
  Emaciation 17 19 31 13 12 92
  Undetermined 0 3 2 1 1 7
  Other 2 3 6 6 1 18
Avian Influenza Detected 0 2 0 1 1 4
Saxitoxin Detected 11 BDL* 3 1& BDL* 15

*BDL – Below detection limits for the laboratory test used.
&Saxitoxin toxicosis was also suspected to be the cause of death.

Exposure to harmful algal bloom biotoxins (e.g., saxitoxin, associated with paralytic shellfish poisoning) has been detected in seabird tissues in the region, including a puffin from Unalaska Island in 2020. In 2017, saxitoxin was detected in the majority of northern fulmar carcasses collected during a mortality event; however, direct neurotoxic action by saxitoxin could not be confirmed and starvation appeared to be the proximate cause of death (Van Hemert et al. 2021). Little is known about the occurrence of these biotoxins or their impacts on wild seabirds and USGS Alaska Science Center researchers continue investigations (Matthew Smith, USGS, Alaska Science Center, 2022, personal communication).

Beach-cast seabirds continue to be reported over a wide geographic range and throughout summer and fall on an annual basis, albeit at much reduced numbers in some recent years (2020 and 2022). Observations at northern seabird breeding colonies indicate lack of breeding attempts or very late and unsuccessful breeding over several years (Romano et al. 2020; Will et al. 2020b). These observations together with the northward expansion of gadid fishes (Pacific cod, pollock; Duffy-Anderson et al. 2019) suggest that the seabird die-offs stem from a lack of food or unfavorable foraging conditions, indicating ecosystem changes that may be associated with abnormally high ocean water temperatures (Will et al. 2020a). Additional work is needed to understand links between prey availability and the health and productivity of local seabird populations.


Seabirds and their eggs are an important subsistence food for remote communities in rural Alaska. Rural residents and particularly Alaska Native peoples are concerned about impacts to subsistence food resources. Members of subsistence communities in the northern Bering and southern Chukchi Sea region are frustrated by the lack of timely answers regarding the cause of seabird die-off events and whether birds and eggs are safe to consume. Some communities have requested assistance to document these die-offs and collect samples for testing. The past three years have been especially challenging owing to the global COVID-19 pandemic, which limited abilities to conduct full necropsies on carcasses to determine causes of death, as well as due to increased concerns regarding HPAI in 2022. The USFWS continues to collaborate with numerous partners, including the Alaska Migratory Bird Co-Management Council, Alaska Department of Fish and Game, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Park Service, and coastal subsistence communities to monitor and assess seabird die-offs. The USFWS also collaborates with the University of Washington Coastal Observation and Seabird Survey Team, University of Alaska Fairbanks/Alaska Sea Grant Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks Institute for Arctic Biology, USGS (National Wildlife Health Center and Alaska Science Center), and other State and Federal agencies to document and report die-off events.

The next decades will be critical for determining how coastal species and communities in northern Alaska adapt to a fast-changing environment. With Alaska’s vast coastline and remote communities, State and Federal agencies lack adequate resources required to investigate changes and document these now annually occurring seabird mortality events. Efforts have led to several lessons learned. Firstly, reports and observations are property; permission must be granted prior to using or sharing observational data and acknowledgment of partner contributions is essential. Secondly, maintaining clear channels of communication, especially regarding shared priorities and mutual expectations, is critical throughout the response process. Thirdly, outreach and information exchange are dynamic, and partners must strive to be consistent, reliable, and inclusive. Lastly, moments of misunderstanding or disagreement provide opportunities for patience and listening. Success begins with small steps.


The authors acknowledge the community members and Tribal leadership throughout the Bering Strait region who have remained vigilant in reporting observations of dead and dying seabirds since 2017. Without their continued involvement, State and Federal agencies would have a fraction of the information available to track seabird die-offs. We thank the editors and anonymous reviewers who provided thoughtful comments which improved the essay.


Ainly, D., and Coauthors, 2002: Common murre (Uria aalge), The Birds of North America, No. 666., A. Poole and F. Gill, Eds., The Birds of North America, Inc. Philadelphia, PA.

Bodenstein, B., and Coauthors, 2015: Avian cholera causes marine bird mortality in the Bering Sea of Alaska. J. Wildlife Dis., 51, 934-937,

Bodenstein, B. L., R. J. Dusek, M. M. Smith, C. R. Van Hemert, and R. S. A. Kaler, 2022: USGS National Wildlife Health Center necropsy results to determine cause of illness/death for seabirds collected in Alaska from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2021: U.S. Geological Survey data release,

Duffy-Anderson, J. T., and Coauthors, 2019: Responses of the northern Bering Sea and southeastern Bering Sea pelagic ecosystems following record-breaking low winter sea ice. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 9833-9842,

Jones, T., and Coauthors, 2019: Unusual mortality of Tufted puffins (Fratercula cirrhata) in the eastern Bering Sea. PLoS ONE, 14, e0216532,

Kokubun, N., and Coauthors, 2018: Inter-annual climate variability affects foraging behavior and nutritional state of thick-billed murres breeding in the southeastern Bering Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 593, 195-208,

Montevecchi, W. A., and J. F. Piatt, 1984: Composition and energy content of mature inshore spawning capelin (Mallotus villosus): Implications for seabird predators. Comp. Biochem. Phys. A, 78(1), 10-20,

Renner, M., and Coauthors, 2016: Timing of ice retreat alters seabird abundances and distributions in the southeast Bering Sea. Biol. Letters, 12, 20160276,

Robards, M., M. Willson, R. Armstrong, and J. Piatt, 1999: Sand lance as cornerstone prey for predator populations. USDA Forest Service – Research Papers PNW-RP, 17-44.

Romano, M., J. F. Piatt, D. D. Roby, 2006: Testing the junk-food hypothesis on marine birds: Effects of prey type on growth and development. Waterbirds, 29(4), 407-524,[407:TTJHOM]2.0.CO;2.

Romano, M., and Coauthors, 2020: Die-offs, reproductive failure, and changing at-sea abundance of murres in the Bering and Chukchi Seas in 2018. Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 181-182, 104877,

Stabeno, P. J., R. L. Thoman, and K. Wood, 2019: Recent warming in the Bering Sea and its impacts on the ecosystem. Arctic Report Card 2019, J. Richter-Menge, M. L. Druckenmiller, and M. Jeffries, Eds.,

US Geological Survey, 2022: Wildlife Health Information Sharing Partnership—event reporting system (WHISPers) on-line database, accessed October 2022,

Van Hemert, C., and Coauthors, 2021: Investigation of algal toxins in a multispecies seabird die-off in the Bering and Chukchi seas. J. Wildlife Dis., 57(2), 399-407,

Will, A., and Coauthors, 2020a: Investigation of the 2018 thick-billed murre (Uria lomvia) die-off on St. Lawrence Island rules out food shortage as the cause. Deep-Sea Res., Pt. II, 181, 104879,

Will, A., and Coauthors, 2020b: The breeding seabird community reveals that recent sea ice loss in the Pacific Arctic does not benefit piscivores and is detrimental to planktivores. Deep-Sea Res., Pt. II, 181-182, 104902,

December 9, 2022

Scroll to Top

Contact Our Team

Fill out the form below, and we will be in touch shortly.
Contact Information
Vehicle Information
Preferred Date and Time Selection